Posts

Introduction

We develop a piece of software with aim to fulfil specific business requirements in terms of resource usage, throughput, availability among others. Profiling and benchmarking are approaches that developer has in his/her arsenal to gain continuous feedback on whether a piece of code is behaving optimally and adhering to it’s objectives.

Lets look at what they mean,

• Profiling is defined as process aimed at understanding the behavior of a program. A profile result might be a table of time taken per function, as per this and this)
• Benchmarking measures the time for some whole operation. e.g. I/O operations per second under some workload. So the result is typically a single number, in either seconds or operations per second. Or a data set with results for different parameters, so you can graph it.. Refer this for more information. Also do check Benchmarking correctly is hard by Julia Evans.

Typically, Profiling is supported by most of the environments (either via IDEs like Visual Studio or through language itself [Like Go] has buil-in provision for the same while Benchmarking is typically performed on dedicated testing infrastructure.

Introduction

I have been reading excellent Database Reliability Engineering book and below are my notes from it.

• Key Incentive(s) for Automation

  • Elimination of Toil - Toil is the kind of work tied to running a production service that tends to be manual, repetitive, automatable, tactical, devoid of enduring value, and that scales linearly as a service grows.

• Important System Characteristics

  • Latency, also known as response time, is a time-based measurement indicating how long it takes to receive a response from a request. It is best to measure this for end-to-end response from the customer rather than breaking it down component by component. This is customer-centric design and is crucial for any system that has customers, which is any system

Introduction

Suppose you have a distributed application running in production and it is based on Micro services/Service Oriented Architecture and have SLA of being “always on” (be available 24*7, barring deployments of course !!). In such cases, having proper monitoring of Application health in place is absolutely essential.

What if Monitoring is an afterthought (i.e. application is already in production) ? and that there is little apetite for additional components like (Visualization tools, specialized storage for logs/metrics/traces) for monitoring?

Introduction

One of the design considerations stressed upon by Jeffrey richter about APIs (Read more here) is that “API is expected to be stable over long period of time”. Recently,for a .NET based project, we decided to upgrade some of the ASMX (legacy SOAP based approach) based APIs and were immediately reminded by Customer(s) to avoid any kind of impact on existing users.

This means that upgrade must be done keeping in mind,

Introduction

In a company/enterprise, typically there are multiple sources of data. This could be result of M&A (where each of those add in a new data store) or result of multi year process of using data stores that are in vogue at that time. Result is combination of various types of relational databases, flat file systems, queues and so on. This results in Data Silos. This scenario is typically observed in companies who are running workloads On-prem (i.e. Pre-cloud, Companies who started on Cloud or have moved to it, typically tend to organize data platform better. This could be because of ease of migrating data on cloud. Typically, they centralize it around cheaper object storage (say AWS S3)).