Posts

Background A Web Application, developed in ASP.NET Core (Runtime Version 3.1.100) using Razor Pages and Web API, is expected to be launched from within third-party Web Application in iframe, with complete HTML being rendered. During the Development, a mock HTML Page was developed to simulate launching of ASP.NET core based Web Application in iframe. Note that this page as well as Application was hosted on same IIS Server and it worked fine. Subsequently, Web Application was deployed on Test Server and URL was shared for integration with third party Application and then it happened Boom…. i.e. Application when launched in iframe rendered HTML but none of the post request would work (returning HTTP Error 400). Careful inspection showed that, ...

Background Recently, i got involved in assignment where in an application was facing issues with throughput. Expectation is to support more than 500 transactions per second while load testing results were indicating system was experiencing high latency beyond 100+ transactions per second. This application is developed in .NET Framework + .NET Core and primarily uses Relational Database for persistence and has point to point integration (mainly over HTTP) with internal & external application(s). ...

Background One of the key project(s) at my current organization is developed on .NET 4.6.1. It is developed as Modular Monolith. As part of it’s functionality, it supports different channels like Mobiles, Terminals and Web. For the Web channel, there was need to develop a Web application with, High availability Lightweight, High throughput (Need to support few thousand(s) active users) Accordingly, we have been exploring developing this Web Application in .NET core 3.1. However, it also means that we will have to use class libraries, targeted at .NET framework 4.6.1, in .NET core and vice-versa. How can this be done? ...

Even Eric Evans explicitly states that DDD isn’t suitable for problems when there’s substantial technical complexity, but little business domain complexity. Using DDD is most beneficial when the complexity of the domain makes it challenging for the domain experts to communicate their needs to the software developers. By investing your time and effort into modeling the domain and coming up with a set of terminology that’s understood for each subdomain, the process of understanding and solving the problem becomes much simpler and smoother ...